A divorce consult is an interview. You are interviewing them at least as much as they are interviewing you. Here are the signals — good and bad — to listen for.
Some red flags never appear in the consult. They appear three months in, once the meter is running. Learn to name them early, while you still have the bandwidth to change course.
Line items for “case review,” “file organization,” or “team conference” that occur repeatedly with no identifiable output. Ask for the underlying notes.
Anything filed in your name should be previewed with you. Surprise filings are expensive and often strategically unnecessary.
If a mediation produced meaningful agreement on several issues, the next invoice should not be larger than the previous one. If it is, ask why.
If you cannot reach your own attorney for a week at a time during a contested case, the firm is understaffed or you are being deprioritized. Neither is acceptable on a case of this cost.
It is fine for associates and paralegals to do portions of the work — often at lower rates, which is good. It is not fine for the senior attorney you retained to disappear from your case entirely.
Urgent work that arises the same week your retainer is depleted should be scrutinized. True emergencies do not schedule themselves.
You can’t control your spouse’s choices. You can notice them early enough to prepare.
Document each of these in writing, in a dated log, the day they happen. Memory fades. Records don’t.